The Magazine For Slot Car Enthusiasts

Of Trains and Cars -
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
By Malcolm McIntyre
As a young child I was fortunate enough to be spoiled with both a slot car set and train layout the same year for Christmas. My first slot car set was a Stirling Moss set with a tan Lola and green Dino Ferrari. It was an immediate hit with my friends and I. The train set was a Tyco with the SanteFe engine and about 8 cars. My father although not much of a hobbyist worked long and hard to set the train up on a 4x8’ sheet of plywood all detailed and landscaped. I remember watching the train make several passes around the track, I changed its track with the switches, dumped the logs in the log car with its electric switch, and went back to my slot cars. I never really took to the train set and it was eventually sold (at least for my dad– at a profit). But it is important to look back now at the influence that the train manufacturers had on our hobby.

In 1960 when the first Aurora Vibrator cars came out as Model Motoring it was a companion for the HO train set. Aurora had the slot car market, free of competition. Train companies however took notice of the emerging slot car craze and soon came out with their own products. Tyco, whose trains were marketed with Aurora’s cars, introduced their Speedways slot car series in 1963. Although the cars paled in comparison to the Aurora Thunderjets, the Speedways quick lock track was a major innovation in track assembly. It wasn’t until almost 10 years later that Aurora would join Tyco with snap together track in the form of A/FX. Tyco controllers were also an improvement in that they were controlled with the index finger rather than the thumb. The TycoTrol controller also contained a cruise control feature, a switch that would hold the throttle at a fixed setting. A Motoroar attachment could be placed on top of the controller to give you that real racing sound – much like the Magna-Sonic units of the AFX era - it was mostly annoying noise.

Atlas, another train company to hop onto the slot car bandwagon, did a better job with their chassis design and their early cars used a unique 5-pole motor. Later Atlas chassis would run competitively in speed with a Thunderjet but with their can motor couldn’t compete in the handling department. Early Atlas bodywork was no match for Aurora’s modeling expertise but later Atlas offerings such as the Mustang and Avanti are excellent representations of good quality. Atlas also introduced the snap on car body with their Zinger offerings. The screw posts were untapped and held the guide pin in front and a placement pin in back and the car snapped into grooves in the side of the body. Atlas also advanced the controller design over Aurora’s with thumb controllers that actually were contoured to fit the hand rather than the circular Aurora units, which were hard to hold and had a small button. Atlas track varied the construction technique by using the connector pins as the electrical contacts, eliminating the troublesome tab contacts found in Aurora track. Atlas intersections were a flush 3” square piece allowing 4 lane or larger layouts to be built flush and yet still have crossing pieces added. This was a departure over the Aurora intersection which was basically two 9” pieces of track crossed. Atlas also made a junction turnoff that was electrically switched like train turnoffs were at the time. Lionel copied the Atlas track design, the next train company turned slot car seller. In fact it was copied so well that Lionel and Atlas track are interchangeable.

Lionel cars were crude in comparison to Aurora cars. Their bodywork lacked detail and accuracy. The Mercedes SL made by Lionel represents a coupe that was a body style that didn’t exist in the real car –either a roadster or gull wing. The main problem with Lionel cars was that the tires that were skinnier than even the Thunderjets and couldn’t transmit the power to the track. They were also heavy and handled poorly. But even Lionel controllers were better than the Aurora thumb units in ease of use and comfort.

Lionel, to their credit did have some interesting ideas in track design after stealing it from Atlas. Tyco had small jump sections and Aurora had their daredevil set but Lionel introduced a tip track that would take the car from one level and drop it down to a lower track. It wasn’t the most practical track piece but was something different. In similar fashion the Le Mans track started the cars at an angle offset to the track and at the start of the race the cars would “pull out” onto the raceway. The best piece was the Mystery Route Selector. It joined 6 lanes of track into 2 and back to 6 with random lane changing occurring. Later Lionel sets came up with the flag tag relay system, another interesting idea, but not much of a real racing item. Lionel pushed the can motor design in their later years and the Lionel “big block” motor would make for a car faster than a Thunderjet but again the cars handled poorly. Lionel offered new landscaping ideas in their Pikes Peak and Matterhorn sets using cardboard cutouts as both scenery and track supports.

Atlas Intersection
Marx Corvette #2162
End View of Bachmann Track System

Groove Buster
The Louis Marx & Co. was still another train company to toss their slot cars into the fray (No, not THAT Fray). Marx track is one my favorites. Its design is simple yet durable. Model Motoring track was tough and was difficult to break but took a long time to assemble. Tyco Speedways track quick lock design made building a snap. But often the track went snap too. The tabs broke off too easily in the hands of children. Marx track is a combination of Atlas and Aurora. The rails are extended to make the electrical connection with the next piece as well as hold the track together when press fit. Clips can be used on the underside of the track but really aren’t needed. Marx offered a railroad crossing with working electric gates! Marx cars were a cross of Atlas and Lionel and they took the worst of both. The cars had uninspired can motors and Lionel type skinny tires on poor rims. Their early bodies were the most crude of any maker. Later cars had better body shapes and chrome bumpers but their cars never really compared.

Although Atlas, Lionel and Marx offered some interesting innovations they couldn’t compete with Aurora’s mass marketing appeal and well-sculpted cars and by 1970 all had dropped their slot car lines. Marx dropped out of the mix after never really getting established. Lionel disappeared in 1967 followed by Atlas in 1970. Interestingly enough, just as the slot car fad was dying off, another train company jumped in – Bachmann.

Bachmann jumped into the slot car market in 1969 with the goal of stamping out grooves. Bachmann track had a T shaped rail and the pickup shoes of their cars were wide and flat. The cars were marketed as the Groovebusters and they used a can motor very similar to the TycoPro motor but were matched to a brass worm gear and metal rims that didn’t enhance performance. The track may have increased pickup shoe life but a wide shoe on a wide rail produced drag and also slowed the cars down. The cars were painted, and poorly at that, over a cheap white plastic that reminds me of a Johnny Lightning car. Finding Bachmann cars in good shape can be tough, as the paint was thin and chipped or wore easily. Bachmann’s timing was poor and their products didn’t offer anything new enough to keep them in the market long. By 1974 they were out of the market as well

This left Tyco the lone train company still producing slot cars, and the only competition left for Aurora. Tyco would force Aurora’s hand in 1970 with the introduction of the TycoPro cars. The TycoPros were revolutionary. Although the Tyco S, Atlas, Lionel and Marx offerings used can type motors, the TycoPro’s Machubi produced speed that stole the Thunderjet’s thunder. Unfortunately, even with drop arm pickups and a weighted pan the cars handled poorly. But fast was fast, and after 7 years of complacency as the market leader, Aurora was forced to introduce the Tough Ones and develop the A/FX.
Lionel Matterhorn Set
Tyco countered with the TycoPro 2, which eliminated the finicky wiper pickup shoes but still didn’t address the handling issues. Tyco then following with the HP-2 Curvehugger which had a better pickup assembly and was the first Tyco to use traction magnets. Later offerings such as the HP-7 and 440X2 were a direct result of competition with Aurora’s AFX Magna-Traction and G+ series.

Although most were not successful, the model train companies did much to further the development of the slot car, track and accessories. Mattel and Tomy are the sole survivors of a long history of model and train companies who both decided to build slot cars. As a footnote, Lionel did briefly get back into the electric car business in the mid 1970s... this time with the slotless Power Passers series. This was again an unsuccessful endeavor. In 1970 Aurora entered the train market with foreign made N gauge trains under the Postage Stamp name along with N gauge slot buses and track. This was another short lived venture as well and both are quite collectible today.